Masonry Magazine February 1987 Page. 48

Masonry Magazine February 1987 Page. 48

Masonry Magazine February 1987 Page. 48
NLRB DECISION
continued

B. Work in Dispute
The disputed work involves the mason-tending forklift work which was assigned to employees represented by the Laborers by Bill Dentinger, Inc., the masonry subcontractor for Hutter on the Medium Security Prison project in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

C. Contentions of the Parties
Hutter contends that the mason-tending forklift work should be awarded to employees represented by the Laborers based upon employer preference, economy and efficiency, collective-bargaining agreements, and an arbitration award.

Dentinger contends that the work in dispute should be awarded to employees represented by the Laborers.

The Laborers contends that the employees it represents have a contractually based claim for the work in dispute and are preferred by Dentinger, and that these factors, combined with industry and area practice, operational efficiency, and skill and training, require an award of the work to employees it represents. Both Hutter and the Laborers seek an award of the mason-tending forklift work to employees represented by the Laborers on jobsites throughout the State.

The Engineers contends that it successfully processed a grievance against Hutter for breach of the Area II contract's subcontracting clause; that an arbitrator issued an opinion and award favorable to the Engineers; that Hutter, Dentinger, the Laborers District Council, and the Laborers Local 1086 conspired to create a job incident sufficient to support an unfair labor practice which would lead to this 10(k) hearing in which the Laborers would prevail: that the Engineers has never demanded that Dentinger violate its contract with the Laborers, nor that Dentinger change its forklift assignment to employees represented by the Engineers; that the Engineers has only demanded that Hutter comply with the opinion and award of the arbitration; that the processing and administration of these charges are a sham and fraud upon the Board; and that the Laborers has maliciously, with the knowledge and consent of Hutter and Dentinger, created an 8(b)(4)(D) violation in order to prevail in the 10(k) hearing, thereby relieving Hutter from its duty to comply with the arbitrator's opinion and award.

Finally, the Engineers moved to dismiss the charge as untimely pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Act, because the conduct occurred in August 1984 and the charges were filed on or about 7 November 1985.

D. Applicability of the Statute
Before the Board may proceed with a determination of the dispute pursuant to Section 10(k) of the Act, it must be satisfied that there is reasonable cause to believe that Section 8(b)(4)(D) has been violated and that the parties have not agreed upon a method for the voluntary adjustment of the dispute.

The charges herein allege violations of Section 8(b)(4)(D) of the Act. In a letter dated 19 April 1985 the Laborers notified Dentinger that if there were any change in the forklift operator, "Laborers Local 1086 will take any recourse it takes to maintain our work." On 16 September 1985 the Laborers notified Dentinger that:

These rights that the Laborers Union will exercise, may include litigation against your company for violation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, picketing to inform the other crafts and the public of the jurisdictional claim of the Laborers Union and a withdrawal of laborers from the job site in order to enforce the jurisdictional claim of the Laborers Union.

On 7 November 1985 employees represented by the Laborers picketed the main entrance to the prison project to protest the assignment of the work in dispute to the Engineers. A 1-day work

Is Cracking the Problem?

KEYMESH has a solution

KEYMESH® Galvanized Stucco Reinforcement Mesh counters cracking problems due to temperature and shrinkage, both inside and outside the structure. Available with or without self-furring.

KEYMESH® is flexible enough for nailing or stapling, works well around tubs and showers, and in veneer and terrazzo flooring applications.

Solve cracking problems with an approved product that architects specify. Send for free Spec-Data® Sheet and name of nearest distributor.

KEYMESH®
Made by Keystone Steel & Wire Co.,
Peoria, IL 61641
800-447-6444
IL 800-322-2632

Meets ICBO, UBC, HUD-FHA, VA and other Federal specifications.

* Stucco
* Plaster
* Adobe
* Terrazzo

STERLING
The "TOUGH GUY"

BRICK 'N BLOCK CARTS

3 MODELS

BALANCE MAKES THE DIFFERENCE

STERLING
HANDLING EQUIPMENT INC.
2300 W. FLORIST AVE.
MILWAUKEE, WI 53209
414-228-7728

48 MASONRY-JANUARY/FEBRUARY, 1987


Masonry Magazine December 2012 Page. 45
December 2012

WORLD OF CONCRETE

REGISTER NOW; RECEIVE A FREE HAT!
The first 25 people to register this month using source code MCAA will receive a free MCAA Max Hat (valued at $15.00)! The MCAA Max Hat features a 3D MCAA logo embroidered on front with a

Masonry Magazine December 2012 Page. 46
December 2012

Index to Advertisers

AIRPLACO EQUIPMENT
888.349.2950
www.airplace.com
RS #296

KRANDO METAL PRODUCTS, INC.
610.543.4311
www.krando.com
RS #191

REECHCRAFT
888.600.6060
www.reechcraft.com
RS #3

Masonry Magazine December 2012 Page. 47
December 2012

AMERIMIX
MORTARS GROUTS STUCCOS

Why Amerimix Preblended Products?

576

The choice is CLEAR:

Consistency

Labor reduction

Enhanced productivity

ASTM - pretested to ASTM specifications

Masonry Magazine December 2012 Page. 48
December 2012

MASON MIX
Type S Mortar
QUIKRETE
www.quikrete.com
800-282-5828

MASON MIX
Type 5 Mortar
COMMERCIAL GRADE
QUIKRETE

Our mortar mix on Vail's Solaris was so consistent, every bag was like the next. And the next