Cal/OSHA to Adopt Federal Silica Standard

Words: Julie TrostOn August 18, Cal/OSHA will hold a public hearing in Walnut Creek to hear comments on its intention to adopt the federal silica standard released in March of this year.

The federal final rule is written as two standards, one for construction, and one for general industry and maritime. The regulation lowers the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for crystalline silica from 250 micrograms per cubic meter of air to 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air (.05 mg/m3), averaged over an eight-hour shift. It also requires employers to use engineering controls and work practices to limit worker exposure, provide respiratory protection when controls do not limit exposures to the PEL, limit access to high exposure areas, train workers, and provide medical exams to highly exposed workers.

So, here’s the rub: California’s current PEL is 100 micrograms per cubic meter of air (0.1 mg/m3). The new federal standard of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air (.05 mg/m3) is 50% of the current California standard!

But, there’s more. Current Labor Code mandates that state regulations be at least as effective as federal regulations addressing occupational safety and health issues.

California’s current standard was crafted by MCAC (then CCMCA) in partnership with an industry coalition and Cal/OSHA as a simple and effective 3-page regulation focused on engineering controls (as opposed to PEL monitoring) that would provide meaningful and measurable methods of protection and be user-friendly to the field personnel on the front lines. The state and federal standards differ in several major ways not the least of which is scope (federal regulation is 1,772 pages) and application along with the aforementioned PEL. Additionally, the current state standard lacks requirements for medical surveillance and a written exposure control plan.

The August 18 hearing will consider public input on the proposed California regulation to adopt the federal OSHA standard and deviations in three areas:

1. Identify any clear and compelling reasons for California to deviate from the federal standard; and,
2. Identify any issues unique to California related to this proposal which should be addressed in this rulemaking and/or a subsequent rulemaking; and,
3. Solicit comments on the proposed effective dates.

See the Cal/OSHA hearing notice and link to rulemaking documents here.

We will keep you apprised of developments on this important issue.
 0
The Enduring Power of Structural Masonry
July 2025

Masonry has been holding its ground for millennia — literally. And thanks to the simple brilliance of arching action, it continues to do so with strength, style, and surprising efficiency. In an era of advanced modeling and fast-moving schedules, one time

Shayne Sanders
Read More
Outreach Outlook: Momentum in Motion
July 2025

As we move into the heart of summer, the masonry industry continues to thrive—fueled by innovation, partnership, and a growing commitment to excellence in education and workforce advancement. June has been a remarkable month, marked by events that not onl

Conner Birdsong
Read More
Building More: Slow, Fast, or Consistent. What is Tempo?
July 2025

It was a drizzly midweek day when I rolled up to the project we were working on just outside of town. The foreman paced the scaffolding, rain hood half-zipped, barking at two laborers who were sprinting bricks like they were late for a flight. Forty feet

Corey Adams
Building More
Read More
Marvelous Masonry: Belém Tower
July 2025

The Belém Tower in Lisbon, Portugal, stands as a testament to stone construction's enduring artistry and technical prowess. Erected between 1514 and 1519, this iconic structure served as a defensive bastion at the mouth of the Tagus River and as a ceremon

Cass Stern
Marvelous Masonry
Read More