Status of Tall Wood Buildings and Next Steps

Words: Hector KarrmasonryAs the dust from the ICC Public Comment Hearings settles, we wanted to share a few key actions coming out of the hearings related to the proposal to incorporate high-rise, cross-laminated timber (CLT) buildings into the next edition of the International Building Code...and request your help.

Throughout 2018, countless hours have been consumed presenting technical arguments (pro and con) regarding the addition of tall wood buildings into the IBC. With this testimony behind us, the next step in the process requires governmental representatives (building code officials, fire marshals, etc.) to formally vote on the inclusion of tall wood buildings into the IBC. This voting will be online and is scheduled to start within the next week.

As this online voting begins, reach out to your code officials and encourage them to vote NO on G108-18 (tall wood buildings). The reason is simple: as a new construction material, cross-laminated timber (CLT) hasn’t been tested, scrutinized, or demonstrated to provide the same level of life safety as current code-recognized materials. CLT simply isn’t ready for the IBC.

For those that want to know more about the shortcomings of the tall wood building code changes, the International Association of Fire Chiefs and the National Association of State Fire Marshals have summarized their opposition to these code changes highlighting why CLT simply isn’t ready for the IBC here:
https://www.iafc.org/docs/default-source/1assoc/position_tall-wood-building-construction.pdf?sfvrsn=4d5a890d_2

And here:
http://www.firemarshals.org/resources/Documents/NASFM%20Documents/TWB%20Position%20Statement.pdf

Some code officials may view opposition to tall wood buildings as simple material bias. This issue shouldn’t come down to wood versus concrete, masonry, or steel — or which system has market share advantages. This is simply a question of preserving life safety and property protection through our building codes. As with all other forms of code-recognized construction, proponents of CLT construction should:

  • Finish their testing and research on the structural and fire performance attributes of CLT;
  • Allow the design and regulatory communities to vet the results of these investigations; and
  • Make appropriate and well-informed decisions on how CLT construction is reflected in the building code.

Until then, CLT isn’t ready for the IBC and its addition now is simply premature.

As always, thanks for your efforts!
About: Featured
Ensuring Stability and Safety in Masonry Projects: Hog Leg, Hog Guard, and Hog Support
April 2025

As seasonal changes bring high winds and fluctuating temperatures, masonry projects face unique challenges. These conditions can stress vertical structures, requiring reliable bracing, while temperature swings may lead to a need for masonry restoration. A

What gives with head protection? Why workers want to keep their hard hats and ditch safety helmets.
April 2025

Last August, I took my pickup to the dealership for a nagging check engine light. While it was being looked over, I chatted with the salesman I normally deal with, and he told me about the latest and greatest 2025 models. He told me how the twin turbo inl

Government Affairs: Bringing North Carolina to Washington, D.C. and Hopefully Young People to Your Jobsites
April 2025

For you long time members of the Mason Contractors Association of America you likely remember our Annual Washington, D.C. Fly-In where MCAA members from around the country would come to Washington, D.C. meeting with Members of Congress from their home sta

Chairman's Message: While We Are Still Here
April 2025

I truly value my days working on construction sites during the summers of my high school and college days. Some moments in our youth are so clearly meaningful that we file them away in our subconscious to be recalled when life events require inspiration.