OSHA Citations for Silica Exposure

Words: Dan KesterMembers should be aware that several contractors around the country (not just MCAA members) have been cited by OSHA inspectors for violations of the existing Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for silica notwithstanding the fact that these inspectors had NO exposure data to justify the citation. This is a violation of OSHA policy!

It is also likely that an MCAA member in Maine would have been cited for a violation of the PEL had it not been for the fact that the company had recently completed exposure testing for a number of specific tasks and the results indicated exposures were below the PEL.

In this particular instance, an OSHA inspector went on this member's job site and noticed that during mortar mixing by one employee, a lot of dust was being kicked up. The inspector asked the job foreman why the employee was not wearing a face mask because it was obvious to him (the inspector) that the PEL was likely being exceeded. In other words, the inspector made a presumption that on the basis of all the dust in the air, it must be respirable silica dust, that the employee therefore was at risk and the PEL was being exceeded.

OSHA POLICY PROHIBITS THE ISSUANCE OF CITATIONS UNLESS THE AGENCY HAS EXPOSURE DATA TO BACK IT UP!

Therefore, my recommendation to you as contractors is to be aware of these citations and alert your safety directors and job superintendents to the problem. Your superintendents need to know that inspectors cannot issue citations for violations of the PEL unless and until the proper exposure assessments have been performed. Also, if you have done any testing recently and have the results, it might not be a bad idea to keep those results on the job site or at least alert your job superintendents to the fact that the information on exposure testing is available.

MCAA is in the process of collecting examples of these citations and intends to push OSHA to issue a directive to all field inspectors that these citations are a violation of policy and cannot be issued with first collecting exposure data. These citations cost contractors time and money. Field inspectors must not be allowed to be both judge and jury and we must not allow OSHA to think that just because the citations are ultimately lifted the problem automatically goes away.

If you have been cited for a violation of the PEL without data first being collected or know of other instances, please get the documentation to me as soon as possible.

Thanks for your assistance. If you have any questions about this, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me at mjmarshall@masoncontractors.org or 703-671-4468.

2024 Architectural Awards: Excellence In Masonry Winners

The Masonry Advisory Council held the 2024 Excellence in Masonry Awards on Saturday, October 26th at 167 Green St., Chicago, Illinois. Honoring 80 projects from over the Chicagoland and Northwest Indiana Area. The Awards program celebrates outstanding ar

NSI and ISFA Announce Silica Exposure Literature Review

NSI and ISFA are proud to present a literature review that summarizes the growing library of studies related to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) exposure. Completed by Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine, the study covers 34 publications and d

La Maison Franchère: How Masonry Turns Functional Buildings Into Timeless Beauty

La Maison Franchère, or the Franchers’ House, stands as a notable relic of stone architecture in Saint-Mathies, a small Quebec town on the edge of the Richelieu River. Unlike the neighboring homes, this towering, two-and-a-half-story mansion immediately c

MASONRY STRONG Podcast Episode 5 Recap: Zach Everett

Welcome back to another insightful episode of the Masonry Strong podcast! Today, we have a very special guest, Zach Everett, sharing his journey and experiences in the world of safety within the masonry industry. From humble beginnings to becoming a vital

About: Featured